We restricted analysis to the three major AAI classifications (Autonomous, Dismissive and Preoccupied) since the examination of unresolved states of mind with respect to attachment, and how these states of mind may be related to later caregiving behaviors and thinking, was beyond the scope of this paper. Replacing the 10 AAI-Unresolved protocols with secondary classifications resulted in 46 parents (59.7%) classified as Autonomous, consistent with the van IJzendoorn and Bakermans-Kranenburg ( 1996 ) norms presented for the AAI (58% base rate). Seventeen parents (22.1%) were classified as Preoccupied and 14 (18.2%) as Dismissive. On the P-CAI, 50 parents were classified as Autonomous (64.9%), 16 as Dismissive (20.8%) and 11 as Preoccupied (14.3%). There were no assignments to the Disorganized category. Classification distributions did not differ for dads, as compared to moms and dads, neither with respect to the AAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(dos, 1) = 1.4, p = .49) nor regarding the P-CAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(2, 1) = 2.4, p = .31).
Cross-tabulation of each parent’s attachment (AAI) and caregiving (P-CAI) classifications (Table 2) revealed strong concordance (fathers’ Likelihood exact ratio G(4, 1) = , p< .0001, Kappa = .61, p< .0001; mothers' Likelihood exact ratio G(4, 1) = 25.4, p < .0001, Kappa = .58, p< .0001). Prediction of P-CAI classification from AAI classification resulted in 77.8% exact agreement for fathers, 78% exact agreement for mothers, and 77.9% exact agreement for the entire sample (86% for Autonomous, 72.7% for Preoccupied and 56.2% for Dismissive).
Composed on the internet:
Stepwise logistic regression is did toward P-CAI categories dichotomized, insecure (Dismissive/Preoccupied) in the place of secure (Autonomous). Preliminary research to evaluate prospective has an effect on off records variables (moms and dad decades, years of education, number of youngsters, ages of desire guy, relational updates) indicated that brand new parent’s numerous years of training had been for the this lady/their caregiving logo class (Wald = 5.21, p = .02), with increased numerous years of training a little reducing the likelihood of an enthusiastic Independent group with regards to adult caregiving. So it variable was controlled to have from inside the subsequent studies (inserted while the 1). To have prediction regarding safer caregiving group (P-CAI/F) we hence registered, when you look at the step 1, several years of knowledge and parent’s probable enjoying and rejecting experiences that have parents, correspondingly (Desk step 3). The sole high predictor was possible loving event on the mother (Wald = 8.97, p = .003). Notably, years of training produced no tall sum towards latest predictive design. Brand new co-parent’s attachment scriptedness (ASA-score), with a high ratings demonstrating a defined malfunction away from painful and sensitive and receptive child-rearing, entered inside the an additional action somewhat enhanced forecast out-of safer caregiving, and that categorized 84.2% of the times truthfully. Parent sex, registered for the a third step, produced zero contribution, showing one moms and dad gender isn’t accused for the, and will not distinguish the forecast regarding, total top-notch caregiving sign (P-CAI) (H5). Regarding latest model (Dining table step 3), possible enjoying experience using their moms and dads (AAI) rather improved, and you may likely enjoy away from rejection by its dads (AAI) rather reduced, parents’ odds of getting categorized while the having Autonomous caregiving representations.
Penned on the web:
To address hypotheses 2–4 concerning links between specific state of mind dimensions of the parent’s caregiving representation and his/her classification with respect to attachment, MANOVA was carried out with P-CAI state of mind subscales as dependent variables: idealization of the child and co-parent, respectively, derogation of the relationship to the child, anger towards the child and co-parent, respectively, parental guilt, and preoccupied feelings of rejection. Parent AAI-classification (Dismissive vs. Preoccupied vs. Autonomous) and gender (mother vs. father) were grouping variables. In addition to the expected main multivariate effect of AAI http://datingranking.net/plenty-of-fish-review/ classification (Wilks’?, F(14, 128) = 7.28, p< .0001, ? 2 = .445), the analysis revealed a multivariate effect of parent gender (Wilks'?, F(seven, 64) = 2.65, p = .018, ? 2 = .225), and a multivariate AAI-classification X gender interaction effect (Wilks’?, F(14, 128) = 2.74, p = .001, ? 2 = .231). Among parents with Preoccupied (AAI/E) current attachment representations, there was more preoccupying anger toward the co-parent among mothers, compared to fathers, F(step 1, 71) = 4.88, p = .03, ? 2 = .06 (Mfathers = 2.10, SD = 1.41, Mmothers = 2.37, SD = 1.87) (Figure 1(a)). The multivariate effect of co-parent attachment scriptedness (ASA) as covariate was not statistically significant in this analysis (Wilks’?, F(seven, 64) = 1.87, p = .09, ? 2 = .169), but a univariate effect on parental guilt was found, with more elaborate and readily available attachment scripts in the co-parent predicting lower levels of preoccupying guilt in the parent. Notably, the gender difference in preoccupying anger towards the co-parent was no longer significant.